Christianbook.com Ratings and Reviews

Customer Reviews for Holman Reference Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook

Holman Reference Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook

Average Customer Rating:
4.667 out of 5
4.7
 out of 
5
(3 Reviews) 3
Open Ratings Snapshot
Rating Snapshot (3 reviews)
5 stars
2
4 stars
1
3 stars
0
2 stars
0
1 star
0
1 out of 1100%customers would recommend this product to a friend.
Customer Reviews for Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook
Review 1 for Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5

Best Overall Commentary on Daniel

Date:August 19, 2013
Customer Avatar
CBDrocks
Location:Alberta, Canada
Age:35-44
Gender:male
Quality: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Value: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
Meets Expectations: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5
I don't usually read commentaries from cover to cover, but this one on the book of Daniel by Stephen Miller is a great read. The author displays a commanding grasp of the historical and theological issues, but perhaps equally as important, he writes well. Miller is easy to read... actually fun to read. He is unapologetic in defending an early date for prophetic passages. He is premillennial. He offers devotional insights that everyone will appreciate. I will be reading it through again and will enjoy using this commentary for years to come.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.
Review 2 for Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook
Overall Rating: 
4 out of 5
4 out of 5

Date:June 7, 2004
Customer Avatar
C. E. Myers
Miller's commentary, which is written from a Dispensational (Progressive?) perspective is essential reading on the Book of Daniel. It is well-written and well-argued despite the limitations of the series. While no where near as detailed as the works by Collins (the now standard work on Daniel [Hermenia]), Montgomery (now somewhat outdated [ICC]), or Goldingay (WBC), Miller's work is possibly the best commentary now available on Daniel from a conservative premillennial perspective. Miller's work supercedes that of J. F. Walvoord, whose commentary is overly-dogmatic and untenable at several points. Miller's work should be used in conjunction with the execellent works by G. L. Archer (EBC) and Leon Wood. One can only hope for a forthcoming commentary on Daniel from a conservative premillennial perspective that is comparable to Collins in detail. Until then Miller's is the best choice.
+7points
7of 7voted this as helpful.
Review 3 for Daniel: New American Commentary [NAC] -eBook
Overall Rating: 
5 out of 5
5 out of 5

Date:December 23, 2002
Customer Avatar
Casey Ballard
This commentary is an excellent source for a person who wants to interpret Scripture literally. It is a great book to read and use for study, sermons and devotional time.
0points
0of 0voted this as helpful.