Though the Bible presents a personal and relational God, popular modern worldviews portray an impersonal divine force in a purely material world. Readers influenced by this competing worldview hold assumptions about fundamental issues like the nature of humanity, evil, and the purpose of life that present profound obstacles to understanding the Bible. Inerrancy and Worldview, Dr. Vern Poythress offers the first worldview-based defense of scriptural inerrancy, showing how worldview differences create or aggravate most perceived difficulties with the Bible.
His positive case for biblical inerrancy implicitly critiques the worldview of scholars like Enns, Sparks, Allert, and McGowan. Poythress, who has researched and published in a variety of fields including science, linguistics, and sociology deals skillfully with the challenges presented in each of these disciplines. By directly addressing key examples in each field, Poythress shows that many difficulties can be resolved simply by exposing the influence of modern materialism.
Inerrancy and Worldview 's positive response to current attempts to abandon or redefine inerrancy will enable Christians to respond well to modern challenges by employing a worldview that allows the Bible to speak on its own terms.
Average Customer Rating:
(2 Reviews) 2
Rating Snapshot(2 reviews)
2 out of 2100%customers would recommend this product to a friend.
Customer Reviews for Inerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible
Review 1 for Inerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible
A Worldview is one's perspective on how they see the world based on their culture. Christian's strive to have a worldview based on the Bible. To many believers they do not see their worldview from the Bible even the difficult parts of the Bible as Dr. Poythress points out in his book, Inerrancy and Worldview. Poythress says the Bible addresses God as personal and relational contrary to what various worldview hold God as.
Poythress looks at how there have challenges to the inerrancy of scripture through different viewpoints of the world. Such as history, culture, sociology, language, and feminism. Poythress seeks to help the reader even understand the "so-called" contradictions that are in the Bible. He deals with each challenge precise and to the point without drawing conclusions that will make the reader feel lost in his words.
I highly recommend this book to any Pastor and Bible teacher so they can be equipped with the challenges that culture has on the inerrancy of scripture. This is also good for some non-Christians to read because Poythress gets to the point and leaves nothing hanging. I am also so thankful that are more books on the inerrancy of scripture. It seems that is one subject that seems to have been pushed aside for the last decade and no good defense has been made for it. I think it was Albert Mohler who said this challenges to the inerrancy of scripture have always been here and will never go away.
Share this review:
0of0voted this as helpful.
Review 2 for Inerrancy and Worldview: Answering Modern Challenges to the Bible
A Worldview-Focused Defense of Inerrancy
Date:June 22, 2012
Inerrancy and Worldview is the latest book from Vern Poythress. It is meant to be part of a new trilogy of books centered around challenges to the inerrancy of the Bible (the next book in the series, Inerrancy and the Gospels, is due out in October).
Poythress' book thoughtfully explores the numerous reasons why many people (Christians included) balk at the idea that the Bible is inerrant. Poythress defines inerrant as meaning "it is completely true in what it says, and makes no claims that are not true." He points out that attacks are multi-faceted: "some of the voices directly attack inerrancy. Others redefine it" (13).
And so the book is aimed at those who would attack inerrancy. Obviously, a book which covered merely objections to inerrancy would be incredibly long, and so Poythress aims at something more modest - and unique. "We will concentrate here on difficulties that have ties with the differences in worldview" (14).
At a basic apologetic level, this work is wholly presuppositional in its approach. Poythress never deigns to pretend the Bible may or may not be the word of God. He acknowledges that it is, and then proceeds to diagnose what is wrong with the skeptic - not the Bible. "People come to the bible with expectations that do not fit the Bible, and this clash becomes one main reason, though not the only one, why people do not find the Bible's claims acceptable."
Poythress interacts with a range of challenges from a worldview perspective: challenges from materialism, history, language, sociology, anthropology, psychology, perceived contradictions, challenges from our attitudes, and also from our own corrupt spirituality. Some of the most helpful work is done when Poythress utilizes Van Til's personalism vs. impersonalism distinction to answer the 'problem' of miracles. What Poythress does most skillfully is to demonstrate that each and every argument against inerrancy begins with precommitments which distort one's evaluation of inerrancy. The skeptic, for example, perceives contradictions in the text because he does not believe that God speaks through the Scriptures with a unified voice. He has worldview commitments which preclude possible solutions to perceived contradictions in the text.
Modernists have issues with the exclusivity of the Christian faith, as well as complaining of the Bible being a sort of 'moral straitjacket.' Even liberal 'Christians' have issues with inerrancy related to a host of beliefs which Poythress demonstrates to be unbiblical. There's something here for every branch of unbelief - Christian and non-Christian alike.
The author has no illusions that this book is a one-size-fits-all case for inerrancy. It is not meant to be. It is specifically targeted towards dealing with unbelief at its root, not at its branches. He acknowledges repeatedly that sin is the root of the problems people have with the Bible. In the footnotes he frequently points readers to more substantive books on different subjects where issues can be explored further while plainly refusing to follow rabbit trails (even very attractive ones that would enrich the chapter) - a type of restraint I hope to learn someday.
I admire this book as a specially focused apologetic tool. It is thoroughly presuppositional, uncompromising, and refreshingly plain to read. I would not hesitate to put it in the hands of a believer who is struggling through inerrancy, but I do think there are better books, generally speaking, for unbelievers trying to discern if the Bible is what it claims to be. It wouldn't hurt for those peripherally interested to simply read the chapters related to their own bugaboos. Also, I think the appendix (discussing the human authors of the Bible and their place in an inerrant text) is worth the price of admission alone.
You can get the book at Westminster Books, or you can read it for free in PDF format.